top of page

2026 MSK & Pain Commercialization & Contracting Playbook

  • Writer: Axis Growth Partners
    Axis Growth Partners
  • Nov 10
  • 3 min read

How Systems and Plans Are Reframing Functional Recovery, Surgical Diversion, and Disability Risk


Why MSK Is a Margin Lever in 2026

MSK is one of the largest cost centers in both commercial and Medicare Advantage populations. Spine, orthopedics, pain, imaging, PT, opioids, and disability intersect in ways that directly influence total cost of care.

The high-cost curve is not driven by:

  • PT visit volume

  • MRI utilization

  • A single procedure

The cost curve is driven by functional recovery failure.

If function improves → procedures, imaging, and disability drop.If function fails → the system pays for escalation.

This is the economic core of MSK strategy in 2026.


What Changed in the Last 24 Months

  • Commercial and MA plans saw increases in spine procedures, advanced imaging, and long-duration disability cases.

  • Large employers now track musculoskeletal-related absenteeism and return-to-work (RTW) as cost drivers, not wellness metrics.

  • Health systems realized MSK revenue expansion often does not improve contribution margin, due to device, staffing, and surgical block cost inflation.

  • Behavioral + Metabolic destabilization is now recognized as an accelerant of MSK pain recurrence.

The result:MSK is no longer a “surgical volume” strategy — it is a functional recovery strategy.


How Payers Contract MSK in 2026

Plans evaluate MSK programs on whether they reduce escalation, not whether they offer “better PT.”

Contracting Logic

Outcome Driver

What It Impacts

Contract Lever

Functional Progression

Imaging + injections + surgery rates

Functional recovery scorecard

Pain Self-Management + Adherence

Opioid risk + ED visits + readmissions

Care management PMPM / coaching

Comorbidity Alignment (BH + Metabolic)

Recurrence + chronic disability

Integrated value pathway

MSK contracting is no longer program vs. program.It is pathway vs. pathway.


Target Economics (Realistic Benchmarks)

Ranges vary by region, plan mix, and acuity.

  • Functional Recovery / Coaching PMPM: $8–$35 PMPM depending on intensity + condition mix

  • Episode-of-Care Bundles: $3,000–$10,000 depending on joint/spine and facility participation

  • Shared Savings: 20–50% on avoidable surgery + advanced imaging reduction over 12–24 months

  • Target TCOC Impact: 5–8% reduction in high-risk MSK cohorts within 12–18 months

Return-to-work metrics are now part of MSK contracting language in commercial and self-insured employers:

  • RTW improvement of 7–15 days per affected employee is considered meaningful and financially defensible


Adult vs Pediatric MSK

Population

Cost Pattern

Strategy

Adult MSK Pain

Accumulates comorbidity and surgical risk

Focus on functional recovery + surgical avoidance

Pediatric / Adolescent MSK

Movement pattern & posture shape adult risk trajectory

Early functional correction + pain attribution models

The pediatric piece matters because adult MSK cost curves are locked early.


Where Systems Build vs. Where They Contract

Health Systems Are Building:

  • PT/OT delivery capacity

  • Ortho & spine surgical planning

  • Referral and triage workflows

  • Imaging prior-authorization controls

Health Systems Are Contracting Out:

  • Functional recovery coaching (digital + hybrid)

  • Pain + behavioral stabilization pathways

  • Metabolic-linked weight + activity progression support

  • Claims-level attribution + MSK cost-curve modeling

  • Disability risk mitigation programs

Why? Because sustained adherence is an operational model, not a clinical visit.


Integration With Behavioral + Metabolic (Critical Insight)

Most MSK cost outcomes do not come from MSK care alone.They come from whether patients are:

  • Behaviorally stable enough to complete care

  • Metabolically stabilized enough to tolerate activity + load

  • Supported long enough to prevent relapse and recurrence

MSK is where the cost shows up.Behavioral and Metabolic are where the cost is prevented.

This is the contracting architecture Axis installs.


Contract Terms That Win in 2026

Include:

  • Functional recovery milestones (PROMIS, PSFS, Oswestry/NDI depending on region)

  • Recurrence prevention measures over 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up windows

  • Claims-based attribution for surgical avoidance and disability

  • Aligned incentives across behavioral + metabolic + MSK lanes

Avoid:

  • Paying PT by unit volume without progression targets

  • “Pain improvement only” quality measures without function scores

  • MSK solutions selling orthopedics use reduction without attribution logic


Execution Timeline (Matched to the Behavioral & Metabolic Calendars)

Quarter

Axis Role

Primary Output

Q1

Define cohorts, build shared cost-curve model

Pricing workbook + payer targets

Q2

Run functional recovery + adherence pilot

Internal + external evidence

Q3

Negotiate MSK contract + integrate BH/Metabolic pathways

Scalable reimbursement + renewal position

Q4

System + plan expansion

Margin lift + cross-service-line alignment

Executives respond to:“One economic story across Behavioral → Metabolic → MSK.”


Why Systems and Plans Bring in Axis

Because no one inside the system owns all three levers:

  • Behavioral stabilization (engagement + continuity)

  • Metabolic control (adherence + risk reduction)

  • MSK functional recovery (disability + escalation avoidance)


Axis is the Commercialization Architect:We translate clinical improvement into contracting evidence, pricing strategy, and renewal leverage that CFOs can defend and CMOs can operationalize.


Let’s Architect What’s Next.


Tom


Founder & Commercialization Architect | Axis Growth Partners tomriley@axisgrowthpartners.coaxisgrowthpartners.co

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
THE $1.2 TRILLION MIRAGE

Why Most Digital Health “Savings” Don’t Survive Economic Scrutiny — And the Framework That Will Define 2026–2028 Winners By Tom Riley Founder & Commercialization ArchitectAxis Growth Partners Executiv

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page